48
Ronnie Coleman came into the 2004 Olympia weighing 296lbs, Markus Ruhl only weighed 280lbs.
*Interact with me on social media*
-Instagram- @NicksStrengthPower
-Facebook- @OfficialNickMiller
-Twitter-@Dank_Nick
-Website www.NicksStrengthandPower.com
v v v v v
REDCON1 10% OFF CODE: NICK10
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
*Discount Codes*
-Body Analyzer 1 Scale Discount Link-
Use code “NickFit” for 60% off Body Analyzer
-Tare Kitchen Scale
Use code “power50” for 50% off Food Scale
-AWESOME Bodybuilding style weight plate necklace-
Use Code- NICK10 for 10% off the Necklace
48 comments
Starting a second channel for vlogs, workouts, and bonus content. Click here to subscribe https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClfyDMfX-RhmExpVm-nCl4Q/feed?disable_polymer=1
Markus was smaller, but more aestetic on 2:09 imo
Yeah buddy
Ramy was 316 on stage at 2015. Still the world record holder.
Look at their age difference.. 😕😕
Markus ruhl already beat Ronnie Arnold classic year so big cut ripped shredded x factor = Mr ruhl in these pics Markus trained for Jay Cutler…,.,
Plus age difference LMFAO that's all that is. Put Arnold classic Markus vs Ronnie yet Ronnie was three years older still than Markus that year. In these pics Ronnie has 8 years older = 8 years more training LMFAO lol ha
ballz to the wallz
Ronnie much bigger legs
No hate on big ron. But if Ronnie had a midsection like Markus's he wouldn't crack 296lbs.
That is completely not true. In the first picture most muscular side by side, Ronnie looks A LOT smaller than Markus. Are you blind?
this year doenst exist huewhuwe
Bullshit!!!!!!!
Imagine This Guy didn't win 1 Mr. Olympia Title
You got no idea kid, 03 is his best year not 04
Shit channel..
Markus ruhl looked better than Coleman in the past??? Fuck your clueless.
Minha opinião Markus ruhl só perde do Ronnie Coleman por conta do quadríceps e posterior de perna,glúteos e tríceps,acredito q se ele tivesse melhorado esses grupos musculares teria ganho de qualquer um sem dúvida,quem concorda deixa o like 👌🏻💪🏼✌🏻😂
Ronnie 16 pounds more, i can't see it.
Ruhl by far the better man
I don't know what your seeing. Markus looks bigger.
Markus turns the front lat into a most muscular
From the back how tf you meant to best Coleman here, jesus, even if they contest on the back he just destroys them downstairs, cyaaa
Nick Markus newer look smal on stage, stóp bulshit
He didn't make him look small, don't be silly.
how can someone with abs like a renault logo win mr olympia 8 times. That is a massive flaw.
how did markus Ruhl not come 2nd to ronnie or even beat him, he's 2x bigger than jay cutler who finally beat ronnie , this sport is rigged!….can some1 explain
Rock is nothing here
Dwyane Johnson is nothing here
No one make marcus look small marcus is the freekest bodybuilder in history in 2004 he was 313 lb in contest ronnie 5 11 marcus 5 10 in 2002 marcus 280 ronnie 295 but if marcus was 5 11" her wight was295 too but legs of ronnie is 92 cm marcus 86 up side of marcus a way beter ronnie biceps 22" marcus 24" look a the video in 2002 marcus inside ronnie and jay and jurge by your self in must muscular marcus make ronnie and jay small https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LFcycjzWvRw
In 02 Rhul ws bigger
Noooo Ronnies shoulders and biceps are smaller the Markus
The Christmas tree tells all come on
0:12 Markus destroyed
Width bro width
Digusting ugly bodies. Bodybuilding died as soon as GH and Insulin entered the scene. Bring back classic physique. Weve had enough of these monstrosities. That look like they were made in s science lab.
…Dios.
Verdaderamente Ronnie estaba a otro nivel en esa época.
Mira que he oído hablar de ello, pero cuando los juntas a él frente a frente, se nota la diferencia. Qué bárbaro
I really think Rühl looks better in this comparison. Prettier and more asthetic. Ronnie looks just bulky.
Soooooo the math doesn't support claims as Ronnie being the biggest mass freak out there. And math doesn't lie. At 5'11 and 296lbs with, say .04% bodyfat, Big Ron would be about 4lbs per inch in height. More specifically, 4.002. Big Ramy, by contrast, would tip in at 4.25lbs per inch of height accounting for the same body fat % on a 5'10" frame. Even at twice the body fat of .08, Ramy tops Ron at 4.074. There are are variables that you could nit-pick to death (like bone density and shit like that), but accounting for those things is nearly impossible. And "mass" is "mass", so those other things really don't matter. So as it applies purely for mass, lbs per inch of height subtracting for body fat seems both reasonable and fair for such comparisons. Aesthetics? Well, that's a completely different story but one, ironically, that could also be reasonably reconciled with math. Hello Golden Ratio.
You didn't allow Ronnie to fully expand his lats.. Lol
Ronnie didnt destory him your off your head mate get some glasses dickhead
I thought they were above 6 feet 😑
Now imagine if they were above 6 feet
2003 best version of Ronni Coleman
size+conditioning
nahhh i dont think so..
Ronnie may have made Markus look small that year but he sure the hell made him look like shit year in year out.
Where are the calves on these guys? Seems like after the 1990's calves just were not as important. You look at Paul Dillet or Dorian Yates calves and there is a huge difference. I realize genetics plays a part but at over 250 lbs the claves need to come up.
Markus has ZERO quad sweep here. Looks weird. No X frame
90% of the Americans here don't want to admit that a guy from Germany was probably the biggest bodybuilder ever.