24
MY PODCAST
[YouTube Channel]
[Listen On iTunes]
[Dr. Brad Schoenfeld’s Website]
[Dr. Brad’s Youtube Channel]
[Brad’s Books]
[GET MY TRAINING PROGRAMS HERE]
[GET MY PREWORKOUT]
[WEAR MY APPAREL]
43 comments
It is Walken, Omar, not Walkens.
The time under tension is very intresting, have you got more information about that? cause i was of the impression it was very important for gains? (i always linked it to hypertrophy, longer time under tension more muscle damage).
And do the effects of giant sets, supersets, ect,.. have results cause of the damage of the high reps (to maybe failure) and not from time under tension?
I mean…were the subjects doing curls and told to just lift the weight allowed to cheat significantly (and thereby use far more deltoid and lower back)? There is not too many exercises easier to cheat on than free weight curls. Conversely, if the quad group was doing leg extensions, then it's pretty much impossible to cheat. Would help elaborate if he mentioned the specific exercises used in the study.
Omar you're not a doctor you're just a big fat curly headed fuck
I think for leg extensions there's really no way to cheat it you have to use your quads whereas you can cheat bicep curls if your not focusing on the mind muscle connection.
I think the take home for me is just progressive overload on compounds and go all out bro on the isolation time.
What if the secret to huge calves is to crack open a cold one with the boys?
Upper body needs complexity
Lower body needs intensity
If you do heavy chin ups you'll automatically get huge biceps although you can't apply the "mind muscle connection" principle on your biceps while doing heavy chin ups, This means that the load is what matters not the mind muscle connection
Moving the weight ≠ training the muscle
"I just wanna get jacked…"
If I "just wanna get as 'fucking-freaky-strong' as the fastest lightweight rower in the word"
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Henrik+Stephansen/World+Rowing+Championships+Day+4/a3cX2gGc3EZ
do you suggest training 'more like a bodybuilder', or 'more for strength'?? 😉
but bicep curl was with free weights? They can do less wrong in a machine (leg extensions)…
hands down the best intro ever EAT YOUR FUCKING VEGETABLES
What if one had lost his mind?
Does he beast's through his workout like a goddamned nightmaric, mythical creature from hell itself in order to get some hypertrophy?
I was pondering the fact that i found it harder to feel it in the legs the morning. This channel is great
omg its the doc o:
Does Brad have any tips for a rising exercise physiology researcher? ;D
As far as biceps group gaining more size, could body English come into play? No real way to “cheat” a leg ext but a curl there is.
I love these science based videos. Brings me back to the days I ran studies in college (i enjoyed school lol). Im happy the mind muscle connection seems to be true as well. Gonna keep an eye out for future studies
You’re not a dr. You’re a big fat curly headed fck. 😆😆😆 Love step brothers
You can muddy my studdy Omar Assmuff, if you know what I'm saying (I don't)
Thought it was gonna be g4p.
Talipia sucks…LOL…Salmon is king….try Dover sole…or petrale sole…..or cod….
How many videos can be made about the same topics
You got Pantera's revolution is my name on the intro
I don't understand – even if you don't specifically try to 'feel' your biceps when doing a curl – as long as you complete the curl you HAVE to be working your biceps? What else can be curling the weight – the quads?
I wonder how their forms were. Like leg extensions wouldn't matter about form because your in a fixed plane while when bicep curling your form can change quite dramatically. Like the mind muscle group probably had much cleaner from then the other grouo
Be interesting to see to what degree they controlled the other variables…diet of the subjects, starting body weight and composition of the subjects. Etc. The interesting part is what this discussion touched on briefly…are the biceps just inherently imbued with a greater potential for mind muscle connection than the legs because the former is used more deliberately and in a slightly less gross motor fashion? Need another study of other muscle groups to determine any accuracy or working hypotheses to this.
I think it was a mistake to use the quads. Most people sit all day and have overactive quads. They do any lower body exercise and their quads fire. The mind muscle connection is already so strong they don't even need to think about it. No one flexes their biceps when doing things in real life and that would make it easier to get results from once they do focus on flexing. Should test on the hamstrings as most people have weak under active hamstrings. Once people actually focus on squeezing I'm sure would get much better results just like the bicep group did.
Now I'm just waiting for research on dat mind-penis connection 🤔
Next study, you should school Group A in the muscles of the quads, and tell them how to focus on each muscle group. Group B should be a control of average Joe's.
The New Jersey Devils have sucked since Scott Stevens murdered his last victim.
AYYYYYY NJ DEVILS!!!!!!!
big fan of this video
ok, green goblin
The Eminem of Hypertrophy Research 😀
Dr. Gainzzz 😇🙌
Dr. JackedFeld The King of MUSCLE HYPERTROPHY
The doctor out here dressing like a 14 year old skater. Respect 👊🏻
Jokes aside – very interesting as always.
Definitely would have been a different story if they had trained the glutes instead of the quads…
Sitting on the sofa next to each other like that make me uncomfortable just watching
73,809th!!!
We use our hands more than our feet, it makes sense there would be better connection in the biceps.